You Think You Have Enemies?

I continue to work on the New Testament today, in The Complete Jewish Bible, with accompanying commentary. I just got up to the stoning of Stephen. I don't like calling him "Saint Stephen," because I think the whole "saint" thing is a bad mistake. Anyway, my father (who claims to be a Druid) says I was named after various Stephens in his family. My mother told me the Bible's Stephen was the inspiration. I suppose it's flattering to be named after a martyr, but the choice doesn't scream "good luck."

I almost wish they had gone with "v" instead of "ph." As I have noted before, one constant reminder that people are becoming more and more ignorant is that increasingly, people pronounce my name "Stephan" and even argue with me about it. It's terrible, seeing what liberals have done to education. How can you make it to the age of ten without noticing all the famous Stephens? And what does this say about people's knowledge of the Bible? I guess I'll worry even more when people lose the ability to pronounce "Moses" and "Jesus." If you're young, you may think Americans have always been stupid, but that's not true. I remember a time when a lot of us were not total ignoramuses.

I learned interesting stuff about stoning. Somewhere the Talmud describes it. The defendant was taken to a place from which the fall was twice the height of a man, and then he was shoved off. If he landed face-down, they turned him over. Then the first witness dropped a big rock on his chest. After that, the stoning was carried out by others present, I think. So it wasn't a Life of Brian affair, where women in false beards threw pebbles.

I had always assumed that one virtue of stoning was that no single individual bore the responsibility. But if a witness has to be the first to harm the defendant, that's not true. It makes a lot of sense to force a witness to drop the first rock. It would tend to discourage lying cowards who are willing to accuse but prefer that dupes do the dirty work. In other words, it might make the bearing of false witness less likely.

A peculiar thing about stoning is that the Jews have been reluctant to do it. For example, I have been told they didn't obey the order to stone homosexuals. One of the commandments says your eye is not to pity those who are to be stoned; you're supposed to do what the written law says. I don't know how they came to the conclusion that it wasn't necessary to go through with stonings. I haven't read the Talmud. I know they didn't make the decision lightly. Jewish law, like civil law, should never be taken at face value.

The Muslims, of course, see it differently. Stonings, beheadings, mutilation without anaesthetic...Muslims are very sincere and fastidious about observing their obligation to do these things.

I also learned that a man named Daniel Zion saved most of Bulgaria's Jews from Hitler. He was a Messianic Jew, too. He was a religious scholar and a rabbi before he decided Jesus was the Messiah. In fact he was the chief rabbi of Bulgaria, and he retained that position even after confessing his faith to another rabbi. He never considered himself "Christian," however. I guess he's a thorn in the side of those who say no Jew with a religious education can go Messianic. Anyway, he helped about 45,000 people escape the camps, so he must have been quite a man. I found a page about him. I can't vouch for it, but I have no reason to think it's not factually correct.

He ran a synagogue in Israel after the war, but his status was not recognized by Israel's rabbinical court, which took away his credentials.

Interesting man. Flogged by the Nazis for his Jewishess. Stripped of the title "rabbi" by a Jewish court, for his belief in Jesus. They gave it to him coming and going.